Research and engagement considerations for alcohol use telehealth services within HIV care: a qualitative exploration in federally qualified health centers.

The prevalence of alcohol misuse is high among people with HIV (PWH); however, access to and utilization of evidence-based alcohol misuse interventions remain limited. Telehealth is one treatment approach with the potential for enhancing substance use disorder treatment utilization for PWH served by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). However, questions remain regarding barriers to alcohol-focused telehealth service integration and telehealth research in FQHCs. This study employed qualitative methods, guided by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, to evaluate barriers and cultural factors impacting FQHC telehealth integration. Eighteen qualitative interviews were completed with staff and leaders across four FQHCs. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis, and codes were organized into a priori and emergent themes. Key themes included the presence of common workflows for referring clients to substance use disorder treatment; existing research workflows and preferences for active project staff involvement; telehealth barriers including exacerbation of healthcare disparities and high provider turnover; and the importance of cultural humility and telehealth adaptations for sexual, gender, racial and ethnic minority clients. Findings from this study will inform the development of an alcohol-focused telehealth implementation strategy for a Hybrid Type 1 implementation effectiveness trial to enhance FQHC substance use disorder treatment.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563574..

Transgender and gender diverse adults' reflections on alcohol counseling and recommendations for providers.

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations experience health disparities due to societal stigma that increases TGD individuals' sources of stress and decreases access to health protective resources. Research has linked experiences of stigma to risky alcohol use, yet there remains a dearth of culturally sensitive alcohol use interventions that meet the needs of TGD people. The present study was conducted to inform modifications to the content and delivery of an existing brief, telehealth, motivational intervention to decrease at-risk alcohol use among TGD adults. Individual semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with TGD adults who reported recent alcohol use (n = 18) to explore factors that facilitate positive interactions with health care providers and identify relevant information for alcohol use disorder treatment. Participants were recruited from an LGBTQ +-focused health center in Los Angeles, California. Two major themes and recommendations emerged: (a) A multicultural orientation of humility is important to develop productive therapeutic relationships with TGD clients when delivering motivational interviewing; (b) Due to insufficient appropriate data on alcohol use and health in TGD populations, feedback used in motivational alcohol counseling needs to be modified to better serve TGD clients. These findings show that counselors' philosophy and behavior, as well as session content, need to be considered when working with TGD populations within the context of alcohol counseling. These findings also have implications for intervention development, clinical treatment, and future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Mindfulness for Reducing Minority Stress and Promoting Health Among Sexual Minority Men: Uncovering Intervention Principles and Techniques.

Objectives: Tailored, evidence-based interventions are in high need for sexual minority men (gay, bisexual, and queer men who have sex with men) to address prevalent mental health issues and HIV/STI risk. This study describes the formative research that informed the development of Mindfulness-Based Queer Resilience (MBQR): a mindfulness-based intervention for health promotion among sexual minority men. Methods: Guided by the ADAPT-ITT model, we conducted a series of interviews with community stakeholders, including sexual minority men with anxiety and depressive symptoms (n = 15) and mindfulness service providers with experience working with sexual minority men (n = 11). Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Results: Six intervention principles and seven key techniques/delivery considerations emerged relevant to intervention development. Principles included (a) reducing minority stress as a key theoretical guide, (b) affirming LGBTQ + identity and facilitating healthy identity development, (c) attending to intersectionality, (d) facilitating resilience and self-empowerment, (e) trauma sensitivity, and (f) promoting healthy relationships and a healthy community. Key techniques represent the pathways through which MBQR may address the adverse impacts of minority stress, including through attention control practice to facilitate agency and self-awareness, enhancing emotion regulation, reducing reactivity to minority stress-informed thoughts, self-compassion to increase self-acceptance, and reducing behavioral avoidance. Delivery considerations also included careful navigation regarding mindfulness and religion, as well as using modern technology to increase reach, access, and engagement. Conclusions: If proven to be feasible and efficacious, MBQR may offer the potential to alleviate adverse impacts of minority stress and improve mental and sexual health of sexual minority men.

Modeling the Impact of Race, Socioeconomic Status, Discrimination and Cognitive Appraisal on Mental Health Concerns Among Heavy Drinking HIV+ Cisgender MSM.

Prior research has attributed mental health disparities between marginalized and non-marginalized populations to socioeconomic differences (i.e., education, income, employment), stigma (e.g., HIV-related discrimination), and cognitive appraisal (i.e., optimism, hostility, satisfaction with life), but the relations among these variables have not been examined concomitantly. The current study utilized structural equation modeling to examine how race and socioeconomic status impact mental health outcomes through increased exposure to stigma and more negative cognitive appraisals. Data came from a randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing to address heavy drinking in cisgender men with HIV who have sex with men (n = 180). We found that self-reported discrimination experiences related to race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and HIV status significantly mediated the relation between socioeconomic status and mental health concerns, whereas cognitive appraisal did not. These findings suggest that, among heavy drinking men with HIV who have sex with men, having low socioeconomic resources may increase exposure to discrimination which, in turn, may worsen mental health. Interventions that address social determinants, like socioeconomic disadvantage, and that enhance coping resources related to stigma, may have positive effects on mental health.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01328743. Date of Registration 09/09/2019.

RESUMEN: Investigaciones anteriores han atribuido las disparidades de salud mental entre poblaciones marginadas y no marginadas a diferencias socioeconómicas (es decir, educación, ingresos, empleo), estigma (por ejemplo, discriminación relacionada con el VIH) y evaluación cognitiva (es decir, optimismo, hostilidad, satisfacción con la vida), pero las relaciones entre estas variables no han sido examinadas concomitantemente. El estudio actual utilizó modelos de ecuaciones estructurales para examinar cómo la raza y el estatus socioeconómico afectan los resultados de salud mental a través de una mayor exposición al estigma y evaluaciones cognitivas más negativas. Los datos provienen de un ensayo controlado aleatorio de entrevistas motivacionales para abordar el consumo excesivo de alcohol en hombres cisgénero con VIH que tienen sexo con hombres (n = 180). Encontramos que las experiencias de discriminación autoinformadas relacionadas con la raza/etnicidad, la orientación sexual y el estado serológico respecto al VIH mediaron significativamente en la relación entre el estado socioeconómico y los problemas de salud mental, mientras que la evaluación cognitiva no lo hizo. Estos hallazgos sugieren que, entre los hombres con VIH que beben mucho y tienen sexo con hombres, tener bajos recursos socioeconómicos puede aumentar la exposición a la discriminación que, a su vez, puede empeorar la salud mental. Las intervenciones que abordan los determinantes sociales, como la desventaja socioeconómica, y que mejoran los recursos de afrontamiento relacionados con el estigma, pueden tener efectos positivos en la salud mental.

Examining the Impact of Race on Motivational Interviewing Implementation and Outcomes with HIV+ Heavy Drinking Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Motivational interviewing (MI)-based interventions focus on changing behavior through building client motivation. It is unknown how racial mismatch between clients and providers may impact MI implementation and subsequent behavior. We used a mixed methods approach to examine differences in Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) coded sessions and post-session outcomes between a sample of HIV-positive cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) participants of an MI-based intervention to reduce heavy drinking who identified as persons of color (POC; n = 19) and a matched sample of White participants (n = 19). We used quantitative methods to analyze how providers implemented the intervention (i.e., MISC codes) and post-session drinking. We used qualitative analyses of session transcripts to examine content not captured by MISC coding. Quantitative analyses showed that providers asked fewer open-ended questions and had a lower ratio of complex reflections to simple reflections when working with POC participants, but no significant differences were observed in drinking post-intervention between participants. Qualitative analyses revealed that participants discussed how racial and sexual orientation discrimination impacted their drinking. Allowing clients to share their experiences and to explore individually meaningful reasons for behavioral change may be more important than strict adherence to MI techniques.

Discrimination and alcohol problems among heavy drinking HIV-positive men who have sex with men: The buffering effect of a brief Motivational Intervention to reduce alcohol use.

INTRODUCTION: Heavy alcohol use negatively impacts health outcomes among people with HIV and is especially prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM). Alcohol problems among MSM with HIV may occur, in part, due to increased stress caused by experiences of identity-based discrimination, such as heterosexism, HIV stigma, and racism. The current study examined (a) whether MSM with HIV who experience greater identity-based discrimination reported higher levels of alcohol problems over time in the absence of alcohol intervention, and (b) whether motivational interviewing (MI) to reduce alcohol use would attenuate the effects of discrimination on alcohol problems. METHODS: Data came from a clinical trial in which MSM with HIV were randomized into brief MI for alcohol harm reduction [n = 89] or an HIV treatment as usual assessment only control [TAU; n = 91]. Alcohol use and problems were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Generalized Estimating Equations found a significant interaction between MI and baseline identity-based discrimination, such that in those not receiving MI, discrimination prospectively predicted alcohol problems over time (B = 0.065, SE = 0.018, p < .001, 95% Wald CI [.030- 0.100]). In those receiving MI, discrimination did not have an effect (B = - 0.002, SE = 0.131, p = .987, 95% Wald CI [- 0.258 to 0.254]). CONCLUSIONS: Even without explicitly targeting experiences of identity-based discrimination, a person-centered intervention, like MI, appears to mitigate the negative impact of identity-based discrimination on alcohol-related problems.

Developing Prepare2Thrive, a community-based intervention targeting treatment engagement among African American individuals living with HIV and serious mental illness.

African American individuals living with HIV and serious mental illness (SMI) may report relatively low treatment engagement, despite treatment engagement being critical to managing both health conditions. Here, we have two aims: to describe the methodology we used to collect focus group data on treatment engagement with a sample of African American individuals living with HIV and SMI, and to describe the results of those focus groups in the context of intervention development. We conducted two focus groups (N = 15), integrating a social-ecological model for our theoretical framework, Community-Based Participatory Research for study design and execution, and group concept mapping for data analysis. Three thematic clusters relating to treatment engagement emerged from each group, with overlap across groups: Medication knowledge, Patient-provider relationships, and Barriers to treatment engagement. Items related to the Patient-provider relationship loaded onto all emergent clusters, demonstrating the pervasive impact of this variable. Findings informed the design of Prepare2Thrive, a community-based, culture-specific intervention aiming to increase treatment engagement among African American individuals living with HIV and SMI. Both our design and findings can be used in future collaborations aiming to maximize treatment engagement, and more broadly health, among individuals in this community.

Engaging African Americans Living with HIV and Serious Mental Illness: Piloting Prepare2Thrive-A Peer-Led Intervention.

BACKGROUND: African American individuals living with HIV (AALWH) and serious mental illness (SMI) represent a vulnerable intersectional group with relatively poor health. These individuals may require consistent treatment engagement to manage both of their chronic conditions; however, due to multilevel factors they are relatively less likely to engage in treatment consistently. OBJECTIVES: To test the acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and participant outcomes of a brief psychoeducational and behavioral peer-led intervention. METHODS: Participants engaged in four weekly 90-minute pilot intervention sessions developed by the current community-based participatory research (CBPR) team. Sessions focused on problem-solving, communication skills, and coping with stigma, and were delivered by CBPR peerinterventionists. Participants completed pre- and postintervention surveys assessing treatment engagement and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Participants (N = 16) rated the intervention as acceptable, and attendance rates were high (87% average). Intervention leaders demonstrated exceptionally high fidelity to the intervention protocol. Participants reported a trend toward increasing antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence from pre- to post-intervention (on average, an 8% increase, p = 0.063), notable in the context of a pilot study. Those who attended all four intervention sessions reported a 17.5% increase in ART adherence. From pre- to post-intervention medical appointment attendance decreased, mental health appointment attendance increased, and HIV treatment selfefficacy significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides initial evidence for the feasibility of a CBPR-designed and tested, peer-led psychoeducation and behavioral intervention aiming to improve treatment engagement among AALWH and SMI, a marginalized group who could benefit from additional communitybased health research efforts.

Examining Associations Between State-Level Transgender Policies and Transgender Health.

Compared with their cisgender counterparts, transgender individuals face both structural-level discrimination and health disparities across health domains. We used recent population-level data to examine associations between state-level policy ratings regarding transgender people and transgender health (poor physical and mental health days, health behaviors, and health care utilization). We hypothesized more inclusive and protective state-level policies would predict better health of transgender individuals. The sample (N=1116) was approximately half white (n=572, 51.2%) and half transgender women (n=551, 49.3%). More transgender-inclusive and protective state-level policies predicted better health in three of four health domains. Policy and research implications are discussed.

Disclosure and Stigma of a Positive HIV-Serostatus: A Two-Step Cluster Analysis of the HIV Disclosure Scale.

Despite national efforts to improve the public's education about an HIV diagnosis, stigma still plays a significant role in how persons living with HIV (PLH) decide to disclose their serostatus to friends, family, or healthcare workers. Disclosure can be related to both positive and negative psychological health outcomes, including rates of depression and perceived social support. Researchers often assess disclosure patterns in PLH due to its association with important health implications; however, to date, there are no empirically validated measures of HIV-serostatus disclosure. The HIV Disclosure Scale (HDS) was created to assess various aspects of the disclosure process and has been utilized in several studies as an adequate measurement of HIV-serostatus disclosure despite no available psychometric data. This study aims to uncover constructs measured by the HDS using exploratory two-step cluster analysis to provide an initial analysis of the psychometric properties of this scale.